# Reviewer Crosswalk

Use this file to explain the amendment in the order a reviewer needs it.

## 1. One-paragraph summary

This amendment proposes to [plain-language change]. The change affects [participants / procedures / instruments / data elements]. The study remains [minimal risk / requires review because ...].

## 2. Reviewer determinations

| Reviewer question | Draft response | Evidence source | PI verified? |
|---|---|---|---:|
| What changed? | | | |
| Why is the change needed? | | | |
| Does the change add or alter participant procedures? | | | |
| Does the change add new data elements? | | | |
| Does the change alter privacy/confidentiality protections? | | | |
| Does the consent form need revision? | | | |
| Are new instruments attached? | | | |
| Is there an AI/API data-flow boundary? | | | |

## 3. Attachments included

- [ ] Protocol delta table
- [ ] Revised consent language
- [ ] Recruitment script
- [ ] Survey/instrument appendix
- [ ] Data-flow register
- [ ] Telemetry dictionary
- [ ] Artifact collection note
- [ ] Screenshots or workflow diagram

## 4. Open questions

1.
2.
3.